Blended Learning Models in Smart University Education
Keywords:
blended learning, smart learning, higher education, smart university, digital pedagogyAbstract
The study aimed to systematically review and analyze blended learning models within smart university environments, focusing on design frameworks, success factors, and educational outcomes. This qualitative review employed a thematic analysis approach. Data were collected through a systematic review of peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025 from databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Springer, ScienceDirect, and ERIC. After screening and applying inclusion criteria, 12 high-quality studies were selected based on theoretical saturation. Data were analyzed using NVivo 14 software through open, axial, and selective coding. The results revealed three major themes: (1) design models—including flipped, flexible, project-based, and adaptive intelligent frameworks; (2) key success factors—technological infrastructure, digital competence of instructors, student motivation, and institutional support; and (3) learning outcomes—enhanced self-regulation, improved academic performance, development of 21st-century skills, and increased learner satisfaction. The integration of pedagogy and technology emerged as a central determinant of blended learning success in smart universities. Blended learning in smart higher education represents a transformative paradigm that balances human interaction with digital technology to enhance learning quality and student engagement. Successful implementation requires robust technological infrastructure, digital training for faculty members, and adaptive assessment and feedback systems. The findings provide insights for policymakers, educational leaders, and curriculum designers aiming to optimize blended learning frameworks in smart university ecosystems.
Downloads
References
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14.
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440–454.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115.
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 30(9), 1–18.
Bower, M. (2019). Technology‐mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035–1048.
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278.
Daniel, S. J. (2019). Making sense of smart learning: A critical review. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 1–17.