Factors and Components of Integrated Face-to-Face–Virtual Curriculum Planning in Elementary Schools of Qom Province

Authors

Keywords:

curriculum planning, integrated curriculum planning, virtual curriculum planning, face, to, face curriculum planning, elementary schools

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and explain the factors, components, and indicators constituting an integrated face-to-face–virtual curriculum planning framework appropriate to the educational requirements of elementary schools in Qom Province. This applied qualitative study was conducted using thematic analysis based on Sterling’s approach. Participants comprised curriculum-planning experts from universities and the education system. Using purposive, informed sampling, 16 experts were recruited, and interviews continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were collected through documentary review and semi-structured interviews lasting approximately 30–60 minutes, guided by an interview protocol developed from the study objectives and theoretical literature. Three triangulation procedures were employed to enhance the credibility of the qualitative data. The collected data were subjected to theoretical coding and thematic analysis using MAXQDA software. Thematic analysis identified three overarching factors, 10 components, and 69 basic themes/indicators. The first factor, child-centered learning guidance within the integrated system, comprised learning orientations and curriculum-content structuring, encompassing 16 basic themes. The second factor, empowerment of elementary teachers in designing and guiding integrated curriculum planning, comprised four components: diversification and integration of teaching–learning strategies, flexible grouping of learners, transformation of the teacher’s role, and learning assessment, encompassing 31 basic themes. The third factor, organization of integrated curriculum environments and resources, comprised purposeful integration of educational resources, design and implementation of learning activities, flexible organization of instructional time, and flexible use of face-to-face and virtual learning spaces, encompassing 22 basic themes. Effective integrated curriculum planning in elementary education requires the simultaneous alignment of child-centered curriculum policies and content, professional teacher empowerment, and flexible organization of learning resources, activities, time, and spaces; therefore, successful implementation requires systematic curriculum redesign rather than merely adding virtual technologies to conventional face-to-face instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alrasheedy, B. B., Alhamedi Alshammari, A. S. M. G. K., & Alrashdi, H. M. (2025). The Effect of Blended Learning on Enhancing Motivation for Academic Achievement in Students in the Faculties of Humanity Sciences at Hail University. Acta Psychologica, 255, 104955.

Apaza-Vila, E. Y., Ordoñez-Roiro, B. E., Caceres-Chilingano, S. E., Torres-Ramirez, J. H., Rojas-Senador, C. D., & Pérez-Alvarez, D. K. (2025). Comparison of Student Satisfaction between Virtual and Face-to-Face Classes in Dental Students at a Peruvian University, 2024. Educación Médica, 26, 101110.

Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2025). Four Key Challenges to the Design of Blended Learning: A Systematic Review. Educational Research Review, 42, 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100590

Eggers, J. H., Oostdam, R., Voogt, J., & Zijlstra Bonne, J. H. (2025). Retention Effects of Instruction in Self-Regulation Strategies in Blended Learning Environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 87, 101527.

European, C. (2025). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning.

Faraji, Z., Hosseini, S. M., & Shirbagi, N. (2025). Transforming Educational Supervision toward Modernization: A Qualitative Study on Integrating Face-to-Face and Virtual Methods. Technology and Scholarship in Education, 4(1), 61-84.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2026). Deep Learning in a Digital Age: Educational Transformation for the Future. Corwin Press.

Khoshkab, S. (2025). A Meta-Synthesis of a Comprehensive Internship Curriculum Framework Based on Blended Learning in the Teacher Education System. Educational Innovations, 24(1), 91-128.

Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2025). How Learning Happens: Seminal Works in Educational Psychology. Routledge.

Li, I., Ruan, Y., Hong, Y., Chen, Z., Wu, A., Lin, C., Ou, W., & Liang, Y. (2025). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Nursing and Medical Education: An Umbrella Review. Nurse Education in Practice, 86, 104421.

Mikailou, G. (2025). Examining Teachers' Attitudes toward the Quality of Virtual Education and Its Hidden Consequences. Scientific Journal of Education and Learning Research, 22(1), 61-74.

Oecd. (2025). Future of Education and Skills 2030: Learning Compass.

Oecd. (2026). Shaping the Future of Learning: Blended Pathways in Primary Education.

Opsal, A., Fossum, M., Elf, M., Undheim, M., & Johannessen, T. (2025). Student Nurses' Satisfaction and Confidence: Blended Learning Skills Training on Satellite Campuses. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 20, e705-e712.

Rahman, S. M., Sorna, U. S., Sarker, M. F. H., Aafreen, S., Niaz Ahmed Khan, S., & Islam, Y. M. (2026). Blended Learning across Bhutanese Higher Education: A Regional Comparison Using Kruskal-Wallis Analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102419.

Sabouri, K., Ahmadi, P., Samadi, P., & Ghoreishi Khorasgani, M. S. (2025). Identifying Curriculum Components Based on Blended Education in Primary School. Teaching Research, 13(2), 28-55.

Sarafraz, N., Mollaeifard, H., & Shakia, E. (2025). Examining Faculty Members' Views and Experiences regarding the Application of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Dental Education. Journal of the School of Dentistry, 49(2), 185-197.

Shapiyeva, A., Baigissova, K., Altybayeva, G., Daineko, Y., Nurakhmetova, S., & Abdramanova, G. (2025). Using Blended Learning and AI in Teaching Physics in Higher Education Institutions. Procedia Computer Science, 272, 439-444.

Unesco. (2025). Reimagining Primary Education in the Digital Era.

Wang, X., Niu, J., Fang, B., Han, G., & He, J. (2025). Empowering Teachers' Professional Development with LLMs: An Empirical Study of Developing Teachers' Competency for Instructional Design in Blended Learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 165, 105091.

Zou, J., & Jiang, S. (2025). Adaptive Instructional Designs in Blended Learning to Enhance Student Engagement and Self-Regulation. Computers and Education Open, 9, 100299.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Salimian , M. ., Hanifi, F., & Afkari, F. . (1404). Factors and Components of Integrated Face-to-Face–Virtual Curriculum Planning in Elementary Schools of Qom Province. Intelligent Learning and Management Transformation, 3(2), 1-26. https://jilmt.com/index.php/jilmt/article/view/439