Smart and Data-Driven Learning Assessment Methods in Universities

Authors

    Mehdi Rezazadeh Department of Educational Planning, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
    Fatemeh Naderi * Department of Educational Planning, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran fatemeh.naderi42@yahoo.com

Keywords:

Smart learning, Data-driven assessment, Learning analytics, Higher education, Artificial intelligence, Intelligent feedback

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically review and analyze scientific research on smart and data-driven learning assessment methods and frameworks in higher education to propose a conceptual model for improving learning quality. This qualitative study was based on a systematic literature review. Data were collected from international databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. Twelve articles that focused on data-driven assessment, learning analytics, and intelligent evaluation systems in universities were selected according to inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo version 14, and data were coded inductively until theoretical saturation was achieved. The analysis revealed three major themes: (1) frameworks and models of smart learning assessment, (2) data-driven technologies and tools, and (3) indicators and outcomes of data-driven assessment in higher education. Results indicated that smart assessment, by leveraging learning data, artificial intelligence, and adaptive algorithms, transforms evaluation from static testing into dynamic, feedback-oriented processes that enhance educational quality, fairness, and evidence-based decision-making. The findings demonstrate that the future of learning assessment in higher education lies in data analytics, artificial intelligence, and adaptive learning systems. Developing ethical frameworks, improving faculty data literacy, and establishing intelligent infrastructures are essential prerequisites for successful implementation. Data-driven assessment can serve as a strategic tool to enhance higher education quality, personalize learning experiences, and promote lifelong learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buckingham Shum, S., & Ferguson, R. (2019). Human-centered learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 1–9.

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64.

Ferguson, R. (2020). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 5–27.

Ferguson, R., & Clow, D. (2017). Where is the evidence? A call to action for learning analytics. Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (LAK17), 56–65.

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71.

Hwang, G. J. (2019). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments – a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 6(4), 1–14.

Ifenthaler, D. (2022). Digital transformation and learning analytics in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 1125–1142.

Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 923–938.

Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2021). Utilising learning analytics for study success: Reflections on current empirical findings. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 375–390.

Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S., & Littleton, K. (2022). Epistemic analytics: A framework for data-informed learning design. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(2), 171–192.

Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2019). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review. Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 49–64.

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11

Submitted

2025-02-02

Revised

2025-03-15

Accepted

2025-03-22

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Rezazadeh, M., & Naderi, F. (2025). Smart and Data-Driven Learning Assessment Methods in Universities. Intelligent Learning and Management Transformation, 3(1), 1-12. https://jilmt.com/index.php/jilmt/article/view/38

Similar Articles

1-10 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.