Identifying the Dimensions and Components of a Project-Based Curriculum in the Blended Education System of the Second Cycle of Primary School

Authors

Keywords:

 Project, Based Curriculum, Blended Education, Second Cycle of Primary School, Context, Responsive Learning, Grounded Theory, Educational Technology

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the dimensions and components of a project-based curriculum within the blended education system of the second cycle of primary school. This qualitative study was conducted using the grounded theory approach. Participants included experts in curriculum studies, primary education, educational technology, blended learning, and project-based learning, as well as educational administrators, curriculum specialists, and experienced primary school teachers. Participants were initially selected through purposive sampling, followed by theoretical sampling based on the emerging analytical categories. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Exploratory semi-structured interviews were used to collect the data. With participants’ informed consent, all interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed concurrently with the data collection process. Data analysis was conducted through open, axial, and selective coding using the constant comparative method. Credibility was enhanced through participant review, expert examination of the coding process, analytic memo writing, systematic documentation of analytical decisions, and repeated comparison of the emerging categories with the original interview data. The analysis identified “context-responsive project-based learning” as the core category, integrating authentic learning, flexibility, and constructivist principles. The need to develop twenty-first-century competencies, the gap between traditional schooling and real life, and the advancement of educational technologies emerged as the principal causal conditions. The major strategies included designing multidimensional and interdisciplinary projects, using authentic and simulated learning environments, redefining the teacher’s role as a designer and facilitator of learning experiences, and implementing process-oriented assessment. Digital technologies, flexible learning spaces, and interdisciplinary collaboration acted as facilitating conditions, whereas teacher resistance, insufficient school resources, unequal access to technology, and centralized assessment systems were identified as major barriers. The consequences included the development of life skills, deeper and more durable learning, a reduced gap between school and society, and improved professional competencies among teachers. Effective implementation of a blended project-based curriculum requires coherent alignment among context-responsive projects, educational technologies, teachers’ facilitative roles, formative assessment, and institutional support.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arabloo, P., Hemmati, F., Rouhi, A., & Khodabandeh, F. (2022). The Effect of Technology-Aided Project-Based English Learning on Critical Thinking and Problem Solving as Indices of 21st Century Learning. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 9(1), 125-150. https://journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_2226_26edbcfdd2049bc04f9e17ed44cb681a.pdf

Assiddiq, M., & Sasmayunita. (2022). Implementing Project-Based Learning in a Hybrid Setting: The Effectuality of the EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension. SHS Web of Conferences, 149, 01058. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214901058

Baker, R. S., Berning, A. W., & Gowda, S. M. (2023). AI for Project-Based Learning: A Systematic Review. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 26(1), 112-125.

Coufal, P. (2022). Project-Based STEM Learning Using Educational Robotics as the Development of Student Problem-Solving Competence. Mathematics, 10(23), 4618. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10234618

Esmaeili, R., Hosseini, Z., & Bahadorzadeh, M. (2024). Key Success Factors and Framework of Blended Curriculum. Educational Technology Research Journal, 40(1), 71-94.

Hsieh, H. J. (2023). Blended learning with mobile learning tools in financial curricula: challenges, opportunities, and implications for student engagement and achievement. Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res, 22, 368-388. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.12.18

Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers' engineering design thinking. International Journal of Stem Education, 8, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9

Mielikäinen, M. (2021). Towards blended learning: stakeholders' perspectives on a project-based integrated curriculum in ict engineering education. Industry and Higher Education, 36(1), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422221994471

Nourizadeh, A., & Zeinabadi, H. R. (2023). The Elements and Characteristics of Blended Education in Payam Noor University. Journal of higher education curriculum studies, 14(27), 233-281. https://doi.org/10.22034/hecs.2023.178420

Pinto, A. P., & Kj, R. (2021). Impact of Project-Based Learning on Entrepreneurial and Social Skills Development. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34. https://sciresol.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/srs-j/jeet/pdf/volume34/specialissue/JEET650.pdf

Rastgari, N., & Salari Chineh, P. (2023). Identifying factors influencing the implementation of blended learning among student teachers at Farhangian University. Curriculum Studies, 18(71), 205-232. https://www.jcsicsa.ir/article_166899.html

Saeidenia, A., Mahmoudi, F., Imanzadeh, A., & Taghipour, K. (2022). Examining elements of the project-based curriculum model in elementary education and validating it: A qualitative study. Research in Curriculum Planning, 19(46), 101-120. https://journals.iau.ir/article_693709.html?lang=en

Santagata, R., Zannoni, F., & Stigler, J. W. (2023). Instructional coherence and curriculum implementation in blended learning environments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 118, 103840.

Senjayani, I. (2021). Fostering Creative Thinking Skills Through Project-Based Learning Learning Models in Nutritional Balance Practices of High School Students. Journal of Biology Education Research (Jber), 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.55215/jber.v2i1.3420

Umar, M., & Ko, I. (2022). E-learning: Direct effect of student learning effectiveness and engagement through project-based learning, team cohesion, and flipped learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(3), 1724. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031724

Zelhendri, Z. (2022). Academic achievement: The effect of project-based online learning method and student engagement. Heliyon. https://www.cell.com/heliyon

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Soltani, M. ., Mehdizadeh, A. ., Araghieh, A. ., Shafiee, N. ., & Faghih Aram, B. . (1403). Identifying the Dimensions and Components of a Project-Based Curriculum in the Blended Education System of the Second Cycle of Primary School. Intelligent Learning and Management Transformation, 2(4), 1-27. https://jilmt.com/index.php/jilmt/article/view/389