بررسی راهکارهای یادگیرندهسازی فضای کالبدی مدارس از دیدگاه مدیران مدارس ابتدایی دخترانه ناحیه دو شهر اهواز
کلمات کلیدی:
فضاهای بازی, فضاهای شــخصی, فضای عمومی یادگیری, فضای کالبدی, یادگیرنده¬سازیچکیده
هدف این پژوهش بررسی میزان اثرگذاری راهکارهای مدیران مدارس ابتدایی در یادگیرندهسازی فضای کالبدی مدارس بر ابعاد مختلف رشد و یادگیری دانشآموزان بود. این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی و با رویکرد کمی-پیمایشی انجام شد. جامعه آماری شامل مدیران مدارس ابتدایی دخترانه ناحیه دو شهر اهواز در سال تحصیلی ۱۴۰۳–۱۴۰۲ بود که ۵۴ نفر از آنان به روش تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری دادهها پرسشنامه محققساخته مبتنی بر طیف پنجدرجهای لیکرت بود که هفت بُعد رشد جسمانی، رشد اجتماعی، رشد ذهنی، رشد عاطفی، ایجاد شرایط محیطی مطلوب، آموزش و یادگیری، و ایجاد میل و رغبت را پوشش میداد. روایی ابزار از طریق روایی صوری و محتوایی و پایایی با آلفای کرونباخ تأیید شد. تحلیل دادهها با آزمون تی تکنمونهای و نرمافزار SPSS نسخه ۲۶ انجام گرفت. نتایج آزمون تی تکنمونهای نشان داد که تمامی ابعاد مورد بررسی بهطور معناداری بالاتر از میانگین فرضی قرار دارند (p<0.001). بیشترین اثرگذاری مربوط به بُعد آموزش و یادگیری (t=8.005) و ایجاد میل و رغبت (t=7.776) و کمترین مقدار مربوط به رشد اجتماعی (t=5.918) بود. همچنین اثر کلی راهکارهای ارائهشده بر یادگیرندهسازی فضای کالبدی مدارس معنادار گزارش شد (t=8.401). یافتهها حاکی از آن است که راهکارهای مدیریتی در طراحی و بهسازی فضای کالبدی مدرسه نقش تعیینکنندهای در ارتقای یادگیری، انگیزش و رشد چندبعدی دانشآموزان دارند و میتوانند مدارس را به محیطهایی پویا، بانشاط و یادگیرندهمحور تبدیل کنند.
دانلودها
مراجع
Alborzi, M., Khoshbakht, F., & Gholami, S. (2021). Physical education spaces affecting students' academic enthusiasm from the perspectives of teachers and elementary students. Teacher Education Policy, 4(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.26457725.1400.4.1.5.7
Arghiani, M., Faizi, M., & Yazdanfar, A. (2017). The impact of physical dimensions of the classroom on promoting active participation in the learning process. Technology in Education Journal (TEJ), 11(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2017.631
Atmodiwirjo, P. (2013). School Ground as Environmental Learning Resources: Teachers' and Pupils' Perspectives on Its Potentials, Uses and Accessibility. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 3(2), 101-119. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iejeegreen/issue/7909/104106
Bahamin, R. (2014). Educational spaces from the perspective of environmental psychology. International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Infrastructure,
Bakhtiar Nasrabadi, A., Bakhtiar Nasrabadi, H. A., & Ansari, M. (2012). An analysis of aesthetic components in the architecture of educational spaces according to the Islamic approach. Islamic Education Quarterly, 8(17), 29-49.
Bakhtiar Nasrabadi, A., Bakhtiar Nasrabadi, H. A., & Ansari, M. (2014). An analysis of aesthetic components in the architecture of educational spaces considering the Islamic approach. Islamic Education Scientific Journal, 8(17), 29-49. https://islamicedu.rihu.ac.ir/article_10.html
Bardi Haqnia, H., & Bardi Haqnia, R. (2015). Optimizing educational spaces in schools across the country. Quarterly Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 50-55. http://uctjournals.com/farsi/archive/socials/1395/summer/4.pd
Bardi Haqnia, H., & Bardi Haqnia, R. (2015). Ways to optimize the educational spaces of the country's schools. Social Science Studies Quarterly, 2(2), 50-55.
Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The holistic impact of classroom spaces on learning in specific subjects. Environment and Behavior, 49(4), 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516648735
Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2015). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils' learning. Building and Environment, 89, 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.016
Blazer, C. (2012). The impact of school buildings on learning (Information Capsule No. 1204). http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCspsules/IC.asp
Bunnick, B. (2014). Effects of classroom design and atmosphere on affective reactions and memory of content University of Western Ontario]. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychd_uht/19/
Burt, K., Koch, G. P., & Contento, I. (2017). Development of the GREEN (Garden Resources, Education, and Environment Nexus) tool: An evidence-based model for school garden integration. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 117(10), 1517-1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.02.008
Calp, S. (2020). Peaceful and happy schools: How to build positive learning environments. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(4), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020459460
Care, E., Talreja, V., Ravindranath, S., & Sahin, A. G. (2020). Dream a dream broking: Development of students and teachers measure of happiness curriculum factors.
Duyan, F., & Rengin, Ü. (2016). A research on the effect of classroom wall colors on students' attention. ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 13(2), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2016.57441
Earthman, G. I. (2004). Prioritization of 31 criteria for school building adequacy. Baltimore, MD: American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Maryland. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239605533_Prioritization_of_31_criteria_for_school_building_adequacy
Evans, G. W. (2006). Child development and the physical environment. Annual review of psychology, 57, 423-451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190057
Fahland, M. (2017). Flexible classroom design and its effects on student-centered teaching and learning Hamline University, School of Education, Saint Paul, Minnesota]. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_cp/6
Farood, H., Rahbari Manesh, K., Khansari, S., & Soltanzadeh, H. (2021). Explaining the principles of environmental design affecting student learning in elementary schools (Case study: Elementary schools in Rasht City). Environmental Science and Technology, 23(4), 21-35. https://sid.ir/paper/953689/fa
Gislason, N. (2010). Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. Learning Environment Research, 13(2), 127-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9071-x
Han, H., Kiat Kawsin, K., Kim, W., & Hong, J. (2017). Physical classroom environment and student satisfaction with courses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1299855
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-98477-000
Mäkelä, T., Fenyvesi, K., Kankaanranta, M., Pnevmatikos, D., & Christodoulou, P. (2022). Co-Designing a Pedagogical Framework and Principles for a Hybrid STEM Learning Environment Design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), 1329-1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10114-y
McNeil, J., & Borg, M. (2018). Learning spaces and pedagogy: Towards the development of a shared understanding. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 55(2), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1333917
Msambwa, M. M., Wen, Z., & Daniel, K. (2025). The impact of AI on the personal and collaborative learning environments in higher education. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12909. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12909
Nielsen, K. (2023). Revisiting the Spider Web Model: Curriculum Design for Hybrid and Eco-Digital Learning Environments. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 5(2), 88-105.
Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students' need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307000332
Quilon, A. (2023). Online Learning Environment and Mental Health Among University Students. Bedan Research Journal, 8(1), 259-284. https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v8i1.54
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006
Strong-Wilson, T., & Ellis, J. (2007). Children and place: Reggio Emilia's environment as third teacher. Theory Into Practice, 46(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840709336547
Tunner, C. K. (2000). The influence of school architecture on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), 309-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010373598
Tunner, C. K. (2009). Effects of school design on student outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230910955809
Vuorio, J. (2024). Studying the Use of Virtual Reality Learning Environments to Engage School Children in Safe Cycling Education. Simulation & Gaming, 55(3), 418-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781241246566
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Williams, K. J., Lee, K. E., Hartig, T., Sargent, L. D., Williams, N. S., & Johnson, K. A. (2018). Conceptualizing creativity benefits of nature experience: Attention restoration and mind wandering as complementary processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.005
Wilson, T. (2024). The impact of AI on learning environments: A comprehensive review. Journal of Modern Educational Research, 19(1), 30-55. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4143191
Yoon, P., Han, S. S., & Kim, K. (2024). Effects of Team-Building on Group Cohesion, Group Efficacy, and Individual Academic Performance in Virtual Learning Environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 26(1), 255-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874241229422
Zhang, D., Ortiz, M. A., & Bluyssen, P. M. (2019). Clustering of Dutch school children based on their preferences and needs of the IEQ in classrooms. Building and Environment, 147, 258-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.014
Zheng, Q. (2025). The Path of Developing MOOC Learning Environment and Enhancing Students' Learning Outcomes with the Support of AI technology. Journal of Sociology and Education, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.63887/jse.2025.1.3.13